MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315448377 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000719

Therapeutic Strategy and Outcome of Spine Tumors in Pregnancy

2014· review· en· W2315448377 on OpenAlex
Tong Meng, Huabin Yin, Zhenxi Li, Bo Li, Wang Ning Zhou, Jing Wang, Lei Zhou, Dianwen Song, Jianru Xiao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancySurgeryNeurofibromaMedical recordHemangiomaRetrospective cohort studyRadiologyNeurofibromatosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Study Design. A retrospective study was performed. Objective. To illustrate the characteristics of spine tumors during pregnancy and obtain better insight into therapeutic strategies of such tumors by analyzing 21 cases treated in Changzheng Hospital and reviewing previous reports in the literature. Summary of Background Data. The concurrence of spine tumors and pregnancy is relatively rare. There are controversies over the treatment options for this disease, which increase the difficulty of the clinical treatment. Methods. Between 2002 and 2013, 21 pregnant patients were identified with spine tumors. Clinical data including symptoms, signs, treatment options, and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were recorded and preserved. Clinical data and treatment efficacy were analyzed via medical record review. Results. The median age of the 21 patients was 28.87 years (interquartile range, 6.00 yr). Tumor types in this series were giant cell tumor (5 cases), hemangioma (5 cases), schwannoma (4 cases), eosinophilic granuloma (2 cases), neurofibroma (1 case), multiple myeloma (1 case), and with metastatic tumor (3 cases). Two patients underwent spine surgery during pregnancy and 8 patients accepted tumor resection immediately after delivery. Pregnancy termination occurred in 5 patients, whereas the rest of the patients smoothly gave birth to healthy babies including 3 premature infants. Two patients died and 2 patients experienced local recurrence during follow-up. Conclusion. With close observation, it was found that most of pregnant patients with benign spine tumors could postpone surgery after delivery. Surgical treatment should be adopted during pregnancy when patients are with highly malignant tumor or experience a sharp deterioration and the guard of it is safer than radiotherapy and chemotherapy during pregnancy. Level of Evidence: 4 The concurrence of spine tumors during pregnancy is rare. The optimal treatment options for this disease have been controversial. In this study, we identified 21 such patients. With close observation, most of pregnant patients with benign spine tumors could postpone surgery after delivery and prepartum spine surgery is feasible for patients with highly malignant tumor or experience a sharp deterioration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it