Nematic molecular core flexibility and chiral induction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electroclinic measurements, in which an applied electric field E induces a rotation Δθ ([proportional]E) of the liquid crystal director about the electric field axis in a chiral environment, were performed on several configurationally achiral liquid crystals in the presence of an imposed helical director profile. This imposed twist establishes a chiral symmetry environment for the liquid crystal. It was observed that a conformationally racemic mesogen possessing a flexible phenyl benzoate core exhibits a measurable electroclinic response in the nematic phase. On the other hand, when the phenyl benzoate mesogen is mixed with a mesogen containing a rigid, conformationally achiral core (fluorenone), or with a racemic dopant with an axially chiral core that mimics a mesogen having rigid right- and left-handed conformations (2,2'-spirobiindan-1,1'-dione), the magnitudes of the electroclinic responses were found to decrease sharply, apparently going to zero when extrapolated to the pure 2,2'-spirobiindan-1,1'-dione or fluorenone limit. (Note that neither of these additives possesses a nematic phase.). The results suggest that the flexibility of the core and its ability to deracemize conformationally in order to compensate the elastic energy cost of the imposed twist is the primary mechanism behind the observed electroclinic response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".