MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315601013 · doi:10.1021/ja208874t

Mobility Mechanism of Hydroxyl Radicals in Aqueous Solution via Hydrogen Transfer

2011· article· en· W2315601013 on OpenAlexafffund
Edelsys Codorniu‐Hernández, Peter G. Kusalik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsChemistryAqueous solutionMoleculeRadicalHydrogen atomElectron transferReactivity (psychology)Proton-coupled electron transferMolecular dynamicsComputational chemistryChemical physicsPhotochemistryHydrogenPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydroxyl radical (OH*) is a highly reactive oxygen species that plays a salient role in aqueous solution. The influence of water molecules upon the mobility and reactivity of the OH* constitutes a crucial knowledge gap in our current understanding of many critical reactions that impact a broad range of scientific fields. Specifically, the relevant molecular mechanisms associated with OH* mobility and the possibility of diffusion in water via a H-transfer reaction remain open questions. Here we report insights into the local hydration and electronic structure of the OH* in aqueous solution from Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics and explore the mechanism of H-transfer between OH* and a water molecule. The relatively small free energy barrier observed (~4 kcal/mol) supports a conjecture that the H-transfer can be a very rapid process in water, in accord with very recent experimental results, and that this reaction can contribute significantly to OH* mobility in aqueous solution. Our findings reveal a novel H-transfer mechanism of hydrated OH*, resembling that of hydrated OH(-) and presenting hybrid characteristics of hydrogen-atom and electron-proton transfer processes, where local structural fluctuations play a pivotal role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207