Development of a Landing Drag Chute System for Very Light Jets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent emergence and proliferation of very light jets will revolutionize the general and corporate aviation markets with new innovative technologies to reduce operational costs, increase efficiency and operational flight capabilities. These jets will be operating from smaller municipal airports with shorter runway lengths. To allow safer operations from shorter runways, light weight high performance landing brake parachute systems have been developed by the author for use in very light jets. This paper describes the design and development of a landing drag chute system for the all carbon fiber construction Viper Jet Mark II aircraft. Design principles and configuration are derived from pervious parachute systems fight qualified for high speed deployments on rockets flown to space and back, as well as design heritage of the Global Flyer jet Drag chute system flown nonstop around the world in 2005 and 2006 by Steve Fossett to set 3 new aviation world records. The design principles and concepts outlined in this paper can be adapted and modified for use in other very light jet aircraft currently on the market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it