MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316053305 · doi:10.5864/d2013-014

Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors Environmental Health Review Award 2013

2013· article· en· W2316053305 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
M. Allen, Andrew Papadopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Health Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthOfficerExcellencePublic relationsPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 25 June 2013 the Environmental Health Review (EHR) Award was presented to Dr. Eilish Cleary of the New Brunswick Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health (N.B. OCMOH) at the Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors (CIPHI) 79th Annual National Educational Conference in Winnipeg. Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Cleary was recognized for her leadership in presenting the potential health effects associated with shale gas development. The EHR Award is a national award presented annually by CIPHI, to individuals or agencies for their outstanding contributions to the field of environmental health and (or) to the Institute. Awards are presented to individuals and agencies that have been deemed to have made a significant contribution to the professional association, the field of environmental health, and (or) the betterment of public health. The EHR Award is issued to a member, nonmember, individual, or organization for excellence in presenting an environmental health issue or topic to the public. Selection criteria for the award include: (i) leadership in effective utilization of communication to bring an issue of environmental health or public health significance to public attention and consideration; (ii) published works dealing with an issue of environmental health or public health significance; and (iii) innovative use of communication tools to enhance the association or the field of environmental health. The N.B. OCMOH, under the leadership of Dr. Cleary, was recognized for its contribution to the field of public health for the research, development, and communication of the shale gas report titled ‘‘Chief Medical Officer of Health’s Recommendations Concerning Shale Gas Development in New Brunswick’’. The report may be found at http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/ en/departments/ocmoh.html. Dr. Cleary’s report has provided New Brunswickers with an enhanced understanding of the potential health and environmental impacts related to the shale gas industry. The report includes recommendations on how to protect the health of New Brunswickers and thereby has empowered citizens to engage in discussions and ask questions related to the protection of their own health. The comprehensiveness of its recommendations from a health perspective makes it the only report of its kind in Canada. The N.B. OCMOH has worked diligently over the last few years to devise sound public health advice and recommendations for the Government of N.B. (GNB), and ultimately the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.081
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.081
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0140.011
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0100.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0960.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Health ReviewSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207