MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2316193282 · doi:10.2523/97800-ms

In Situ Bitumen Overview and Activity Update in the Province of Alberta

2005· article· en· W2316193282 on OpenAlexaffabout
K. Sadler, Peter Davis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceAsphaltPetroleumComputer scienceOperations researchEnvironmental scienceArchaeologyEngineeringGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In-Situ Bitumen Overview and Activity Update - an AEUB Perspective Keith Sadler; Keith Sadler Alberta Energy & Utilities Board Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Peter Ballachey Davis Peter Ballachey Davis Alberta Energy & Utilities Board Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2005. Paper Number: SPE-97800-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/97800-MS Published: November 01 2005 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Sadler, Keith, and Peter Ballachey Davis. "In-Situ Bitumen Overview and Activity Update - an AEUB Perspective." Paper presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/97800-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium Search Advanced Search AbstractThe Alberta Energy and Utilities Board regulates all energy-related operations, including bitumen and heavy oil recovery activities, in the province of Alberta. With the high petroleum commodity prices in recent years, activity and investment levels in this sector have increased dramatically and are forecast to increase even more in the foreseeable future. New and innovative technology is moving rapidly from the laboratories to field implementation to increase recovery rates, improve operational efficiencies and reduce costs.This paper presents a brief overview of the current regulatory process for the in situ thermal bitumen recovery sector. There is a discussion on the major regulatory issues associated with the in situ bitumen recovery projects. A summary of the bitumen reserve statistics and production forecasts, broken down to the recovery technologies, is also provided.IntroductionBitumen exploration and exploitation are important and growing components of Alberta's petroleum resource development strategy. The combination of massive resource potential, new technology and significant investments to exploit the bitumen and heavy oil resources is drawing world-wide attention to Alberta.There are two main operational processes for recovering bitumen: surface mining and in situ recovery technologies. This paper focuses on the in situ processes, although certain references and statistics are provided on mining of bitumen for comparative purposes.DiscussionOverview of the Alberta Energy and Utilities BoardThe Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (EUB) is an independent, quasi-judicial agency of the Government of Alberta. The mission of the EUB is to ensure that the discovery, development, and delivery of Alberta's energy resources and utilities services take place in a manner that is fair, responsible, and in the public interest. The EUB regulates the safe, responsible, and efficient development of Alberta's energy resources: oil, natural gas, oil sands, coal, electrical energy and the pipelines and transmission lines to move the resources to market.The EUB is established under the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Act and associated regulations. The EUB was created, effective February 15, 1995, by the amalgamation of the Energy Resources Conservation Board and the Public Utilities Board. Effective April 1, 1996, the Alberta Geological Survey became part of the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board.The EUB has approximately 800 employees located in the Calgary head office and eleven field and sub-offices. The EUB has an annual budget in the order of C$120 million. It is funded through a levy and assessment on oil, gas and energy production from industry, a provincial government grant, and fees for information and certain other services.Oil Sands AreasThe EUB has defined three Oil Sands Areas (OSA) in Alberta: the Athabasca, Cold Lake and Peace River OSAs (refer to Figure 1). Operations and reserve allocations are assigned by the EUB to each of the OSAs, as discussed in this paper. Keywords: presentation, bitumen resource, athabasca osa, steam-assisted gravity drainage, information, bitumen project, alberta, upstream oil & gas, alberta energy, operator Subjects: Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Thermal methods This content is only available via PDF. 2005. SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPetroleum Processing and Analysis→French-language works237,207→