Cue-induced renewal of heroin place preference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is well established that re-exposure to a context paired with the effects of drugs of abuse can renew extinguished drug seeking behavior. A context, however, typically includes several stimuli, which may differ in their ability to control drug-oriented behaviors. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to assess whether a heroin-induced place preference could be recovered by re-exposure to a contextual stimulus that was part of the conditioning context before extinction. The second objective was to explore the role of the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) in this conditioned effect. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with 3 mg/kg heroin and confined in a compartment that was distinguished by a variety of contextual stimuli, including a ceramic floor tile. During extinction, the floor stimulus was removed, and it was reintroduced for a drug-free test of preference. A control experiment evaluated the unconditioned preference for the floor stimulus. It was found that reintroduction of the floor stimulus caused the recovery of heroin place preference. This effect was not observed in rats infused in the BLA with muscimol (0.03 nmol) and baclofen (0.3 nmol) just prior to the test. These data suggest that an extinguished heroin place preference can be renewed by a contextual tactual stimulus that was part of the conditioning context, and that this process requires an intact BLA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".