MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316400818 · doi:10.1021/je300361j

Limiting Conductivities and Ion Association Constants of Aqueous NaCl under Hydrothermal Conditions: Experimental Data and Correlations

2012· article· en· W2316400818 on OpenAlexafffund
G. H. Zimmerman, Hugues Arcis, Peter R. Tremaine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersBruce Power
KeywordsChemistryAqueous solutionConductivityViscosityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Ionic bondingIonSodiumDilutionLimitingIonic conductivityConductanceElectrical resistivity and conductivityChlorideInorganic chemistryThermodynamicsElectrolyteChromatographyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency-dependent electrical conductivities of solutions of aqueous sodium chloride have been measured from T = 298 K to T = 623 K at p = 20 MPa, over a very wide range of ionic strength (2·10 –5 to 0.17 mol·kg –1 ) using a unique high-precision flow-through alternating current (AC) electrical conductance instrument. Experimental values for the equivalent conductivity, Λ, were used to calculate molar conductivities at infinite dilution, Λ°, using the Fuoss–Hsia–Fernandez–Prini (FHFP) and Turq–Blum–Bernard–Kunz (TBBK) ionic conductivity models. The resulting values for the limiting conductivity Λ° and the ion association constant of NaCl, from this work and critically evaluated literature data above 277 K, were represented to within the combined experimental uncertainties, as functions of viscosity and solvent density, respectively. New values and new correlations are reported for the limiting equivalent conductivities of the sodium ion, λ°(Na + ), and the chloride ion, λ°(Cl – ) from 277 K and 100 kPa to 1073 K and 500 MPa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsFrench-language works237,207