MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2316422064 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-1208

Surface Ice Effects on the Extreme and Fatigue Loading of Bottom Fixed Offshore Wind Turbines

2015· article· en· W2316422064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timothy J. McCoy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsOffshore wind powerSubmarine pipelineWind powerMarine engineeringGeologySurface (topology)Environmental scienceOceanographyEngineeringGeometryMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As interest and investment in offshore wind projects increases worldwide, some turbines will be installed in locations where ice of significant thickness forms on the water’s surface. This ice moves under the driving forces of wind, water, and thermal effects and may result in substantial forces on bottom-fixed structures. The North and Baltic Seas in Europe have begun to see significant wind project development and the Great Lakes of the United States and Canada, all regions that experience significant floating ice, will likely see wind projects in the near future. Because the forces imparted by surface ice are dynamic in nature, design of the support structures for these projects will require the calculation of the simultaneous effects of turbine operational, wind, and ice forces. The IEC standard for offshore wind turbine design and the ISO standard for offshore structures provide requirements and algorithms for the calculation of ice-induced forces; however, currently none of the widely used wind turbine dynamic simulation codes provide the ability to calculate and apply dynamic ice loads. A new suite of subroutines has been developed by the authors, collectively called IceFloe, which meets the requirements of these standards for design of support structures in ice prone waters, and has been coupled and tested with four wind turbine simulation codes. The IceFloe routines have been linked and tested with FAST, a tool developed under the management of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. This integrated tool has been run with a 5 MW example turbine and ice conditions from selected areas of the Great Lakes with a range of ice thickness and velocity. Extreme and fatigue load calculations have been made and compared with and without the effects of ice loading. Example results from these calculations are presented. Results indicate that surface ice loading can impact the design of offshore support structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→