Surface pattern transfer in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GaAs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>with molecular beams of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The time evolution of surface gratings on $\mathrm{GaAs}(001)$ during maskless thermal ${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$ etching is investigated using atomic force microscopy and real-time measurements of diffracted light intensity. The decay of the grating depends strongly on its orientation with respect to the crystal axes. The pattern transfer can be altered significantly by using a directional molecular beam of ${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$ instead of exposure to a nondirectional low-pressure gas phase. In particular, if the molecular beam is incident on the sample from an off-normal direction, the grating shape develops a strong asymmetry. A numerical model consisting of two coupled partial differential equations for the surface height and the concentration of chlorine on the surface is in good quantitative agreement with the observed shape evolution. The model includes the effects of the crystal anisotropy of the etch rate, spatial inhomogeneity of the ${\mathrm{Cl}}_{2}$ flux to the surface, and surface diffusion of the chlorine. Fits of the model to the surface shapes allow us to determine the diffusion length of chlorine on $\mathrm{GaAs}(001)$ to be on the order of $50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ at 200 \ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.132 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".