Warm-season heat stress in moose (<i>Alces</i><i>alces</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding how moose (Alces alces (L., 1758)) are affected by temperature is critical for determining why populations have recently declined at the southern extent of their North American range. Warm-season heat-stress thresholds of 14 and 20 °C are commonly used to study moose, but the variable response of free-ranging moose to temperatures above these thresholds suggests that moose may be more tolerant to heat. We studied zoo-managed cow and bull moose to identify factors that influence warm-season heat stress. We found clear behavioral and physiological responses to thermal conditions. Moose selected shade, indicating solar radiation affects heat stress. Temperature and wind influenced respiration rates. Heat-stress thresholds for moose occurred at 17 °C when bedded under calm conditions and 24 °C when bedded under wind, demonstrating that the onset of heat stress is sensitive to wind and incorporating wind velocity into analyses would improve investigations of heat stress. Moose showing symptoms of gastrointestinal illness selected wind at lower temperatures than healthy moose, suggesting the effects of climate change will be compounded for health-compromised moose. Determining why moose are declining at the southern extent of their range may require understanding how temperature interacts with wind, moose health, and other factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".