MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316550813 · doi:10.1130/g32408.1

The déjà vu effect: Recurrent patterns in exploitation of ecospace, establishment of the mixed layer, and distribution of matgrounds

2011· article· en· W2316550813 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luís A. Buatois, M. Gabriela Mángano

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationDownloadIconDistribution (mathematics)Citation databaseComputer scienceLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebBiologyMathematicsMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| December 01, 2011 The déjà vu effect: Recurrent patterns in exploitation of ecospace, establishment of the mixed layer, and distribution of matgrounds Luis A. Buatois; Luis A. Buatois * Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 114 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada *E-mails: luis.buatois@usask.ca; gabriela.mangano@usask.ca. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar M. Gabriela Mángano M. Gabriela Mángano * Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 114 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada *E-mails: luis.buatois@usask.ca; gabriela.mangano@usask.ca. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (2011) 39 (12): 1163–1166. https://doi.org/10.1130/G32408.1 Article history received: 28 Apr 2011 rev-recd: 14 Jul 2011 accepted: 17 Jul 2011 first online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share MailTo Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Luis A. Buatois, M. Gabriela Mángano; The déjà vu effect: Recurrent patterns in exploitation of ecospace, establishment of the mixed layer, and distribution of matgrounds. Geology 2011;; 39 (12): 1163–1166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G32408.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Although the notion of recurrent trace-fossil assemblages through geologic time as a result of similar sets of environmental conditions has a long history in ichnology, the idea that recurrent ichnofaunas may have occurred in connection with macroevolutionary events has not yet been put forward. We refer to this phenomenon as "the Déjà vu effect," and suggest that understanding its significance may shed light on how organisms colonize underutilized or empty ecospace, the establishment of the mixed layer, and the temporal and spatial distribution of matgrounds. These recurrent trace-fossil assemblages record the activity of the epifauna and a very shallow tier infauna, in the absence of mid- to deep-tier trace fossils and mottled textures. They typically consist of grazing trails, very shallow feeding burrows, and arthropod trackways. Shallow-tier burrows and trails with well-developed scratch marks may be present. These ichnofaunas suggest that the initial exploitation of underutilized or empty ecospace is linked to a set of recurrent behavioral strategies to obtain food from matgrounds and firmgrounds in the absence of a well-developed mixed layer. Preservation of these behaviors in the form of trace fossils is mediated by a set of taphonomic conditions. These taphonomic windows occur during the initial colonization of empty or underutilized ecospace, such as the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition or the subsequent colonization of the land, but also after the end-Permian mass extinction, which may have had a negative impact on the mixed layer in marine environments, producing a return to the ecologic conditions of the early Paleozoic. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207