MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316594122 · doi:10.1021/ct200141v

Introduction of a New Theory for the Calculation of Magnetic Coupling Based on Spin–Flip Constricted Variational Density Functional Theory. Application to Trinuclear Copper Complexes which Model the Native Intermediate in Multicopper Oxidases

2011· article· en· W2316594122 on OpenAlexaff
Hristina R. Zhekova, Michel Seth, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDensity functional theorySpin (aerodynamics)Coupling constantCoupling (piping)AntiferromagnetismSpinsSymmetry (geometry)ChemistryMultipletComputational chemistryPhysicsMolecular physicsQuantum mechanicsCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsSpectral lineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have introduced a new method for the calculation of spin-exchange between weakly interacting electron spins on different metal centers. The method is based on spin-flip constricted variational density functional theory (SF-CV-DFT). The application of SF-CV-DFT to two trinuclear systems [Cu3(L)(μ3-O)](4+) and [(L')3]Cu3(μ-OH)3](3+) revealed that SF-CV-DFT affords exchange coupling constants that are similar to the values obtained by the traditional broken-symmetry (BS) scheme for the same functional. The BHandHLYP functional affords for both systems the best fit to experiment and results from high-level theory in the case of BS-DFT as well as SF-CV(2)-DFT. All methods and functionals predict [Cu(L)(μ3-O)](4+) to be ferromagnetic and the [(L')3Cu3(μ-OH)3](3+) system to be antiferromagnetic. The SF-CV(2)-DFT method is not only able to evaluate exchange coupling constants, it can in addition calculate the full multiplet spectrum with complete use of spatial symmetry. Further, in its restricted formulation, calculations can be carried out with use of full spin-symmetry without spin-contamination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Theory and ComputationSame topicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation MechanismsFrench-language works237,207