Lung contusion in children—Early computed tomography versus radiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate, in children, the correlation between the extent of lung contusion as detected on early radiologic examination (chest radiograph [CXR] and/or thoracic computed tomography [TCT]) and subsequent clinical outcome measures. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review study with blinded assessment of thoracic imaging. SETTING: A university-affiliated, level 1 designated pediatric trauma center. INTERVENTIONS: None. PATIENTS: Patients (1-18 yrs) who, between April 2000 and October 2005, were diagnosed with lung contusion were eligible for study entry. The medical records of those patients who underwent early (within the first 24 hrs of admission) thoracic imaging (CXR and/or TCT) were reviewed. A pulmonary contusion score (PCS) was assigned to each thoracic image according to the extent of contusion injury by two investigators blinded to each others score and the clinical details of the patient. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included in the study. Twenty patients had undergone CXR only, whereas 54 had undergone both CXR and TCT. The mean PCS on CXR was 3.9 +/- 3.6 compared with 6.5 +/- 3.49 on TCT (p < .001). In eight patients (15%) who underwent TCT and CXR, the CXR failed to demonstrate a lung contusion. The PCS derived from CXR examination correlated positively with lower Pao2/Fio2 (r = -.36, p = .019), higher ventilation index (r = .35, p = .014), and longer length of ventilation (r = .28, p = .019). No such correlation was seen with TCT-derived PCS. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of lung contusion determined by CXR, but not TCT, correlates with impairment of oxygenation, CO2 exchange, and duration of ventilatory support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".