Kinetics Studies of the Gas-Phase Reactions of NO<sub>3</sub>Radicals with Series of 1-Alkenes, Dienes, Cycloalkenes, Alkenols, and Alkenals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The gas-phase reactions of NO(3) radicals with series of 1-alkenes, dienes, cycloalkenes, alkenols, and alkenals were studied in pure N(2) or 20% O(2)/80% N(2) bath gas at room temperature and atmospheric pressure using a relative rates technique. Rate coefficients were derived from rates of loss of the organic compounds observed using a chemical ionization mass spectrometer. No difference in the measured kinetic data was observed in the presence or absence of O(2). The rate coefficients obtained (k (10(-13) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1)), with uncertainties representing 95% confidence intervals) are as follows: 1-hexene, 0.233 ± 0.021; 1-heptene, 0.245 ± 0.029; 1-octene, 0.292 ± 0.044; 1,3-butadiene, 1.24 ± 0.09; isoprene, 6.24 ± 0.11; 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene, 14.1 ± 0.5; 1,3-cyclohexadiene, 112 ± 8; cyclopentene, 4.82 ± 0.13; cyclohexene, 5.38 ± 0.20; cycloheptene, 5.28 ± 0.23; 2-buten-1-ol (crotyl alcohol), 3.23 ± 0.12; cis-2-penten-1-ol, 3.11 ± 0.11; cis-2-hexen-1-ol, 3.81 ± 0.38; trans-2-pentenal, 0.193 ± 0.040; trans-2-hexenal, 0.136 ± 0.029; trans-2-heptenal, 0.231 ± 0.036; cis-4-heptenal, 4.03 ± 0.24. The measured rate coefficients are compared to values from previous studies and three structure-activity relationships (SARs), and good agreement is found, in general. In particular, the recently developed SAR of Kerdouci et al. (Kerdouci, J.; Picquet-Varrault, B.; Doussin, J. ChemPhysChem2010, 11, 3909-3920.) is found to estimate the rate coefficients within 35% for all of the measured reactions except for NO(3) + 1,3-butadiene. The SAR prediction for that reaction is nearly 50% lower than the measured value, suggesting that it underestimates the effect of conjugation on the reaction of NO(3) with this small diene. The measured rate coefficients for reactions with a series of alkenols are used to modify the SAR substituent factor for the -CH(2)OH group, and those for reactions with a series of trans-2-alkenals are used to derive a substituent factor for the -C(O)H group, which was not included in the original SAR because of insufficient experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".