MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316792266 · doi:10.7785/tcrt.2012.500307

Time-Domain Microwave Breast Cancer Detection: Extensive System Testing with Phantoms

2012· article· en· W2316792266 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily Porter, Adam Santorelli, Mark Coates, Milica Popović

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology in Cancer Research & Treatment · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsBreast cancerMicrowave imagingMammographyBreast tissueMagnetic resonance imagingBreast MRIMedicineUltrasoundBreast imagingMicrowaveCancerBiomedical engineeringRadiologyComputer scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early detection of breast cancer is known to be a key factor in the successful treatment of the disease. Here, we present a detection technique complementary to the currently used modalities (primarily mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging). Our time-domain breast cancer detection system transmits microwave-range pulses into the breast and records the scattering off of the breast in order to detect malignancies. This method is made possible by an intrinsic contrast in the dielectric parameters, specifically the relative permittivity and conductivity, of the healthy and malignant breast tissues over the microwave frequency range. The long-term goal of our work is to develop a system that can be used periodically to monitor for unusual changes in breast tissues; for instance, healthy breasts would be scanned, and follow-up scans at regular intervals would detect any small changes in breast tissue composition that could indicate the presence of a malignant growth. At that point, the patient would be referred to see a doctor for further investigation of the abnormal results. Such a system would compare each new scan with previous ones to determine the level of tissue changes, and would be used by patients at home. We report feasibility and performance tests for our initial system, conducted with breast phantoms made up of tissue-mimicking materials (unique skin, fat, gland and tumor mixtures). We initiated the system testing with simple homogeneous phantoms, consisting solely of adipose tissue. Then, we extended our tests to cases of increasing complexity by adding a skin layer and varying percentages of glandular structures and tumor sizes. In order to optimize the experimental system, we performed tests with multiple antenna arrangements, tumor sizes and locations. This work shows that there are specific antenna arrangements that are advantageous for tumor detection and demonstrates the capabilities of our time-domain microwave breast tumor detection system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnology in Cancer Research & TreatmentSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207