MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2316871860 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100005163

Bilateral Agenesis of the Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus in a Neurologically Normal Adult

2006· article· en· W2316871860 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Arthur W. Clark, Harvey B. Sarnat

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDentate gyrusHippocampal formationGranule cellNeuroscienceNeurogenesisAgenesisBiologyAnatomyPathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ontogenic development of granule cells in the hippocampal dentate gyrus is influenced by genes including WNT3, EMX2, NEUROD, and LEF1. Dentate granule cells continue to be generated from stem cell precursors postnatally and during adult life, and are implicated in normal and abnormal neurological function. Developmental privation of dentate granule cells is rare and essentially always occurs in the context of other neurodevelopmental abnormalities. We have found no previous reports of severe, selective agenesis of dentate granule cells in humans. METHODS: A gross and microscopic examination of the brain included appropriate histochemical and immunohistochemical preparations and examination of the hippocampal formation at multiple levels bilaterally. RESULTS: This neurologically normal 82-year-old man was found to have bilateral agenesis of the hippocampal dentate gyrus, no identifiable dentate granule cells, and moderate disorganization of the pyramidal cell layer of Ammon's horn. We found no neurodevelopmental abnormalities outside the hippocampus. CONCLUSIONS: The hippocampal architectural alterations in this patient are similar to those associated with a murine Lef1 mutation, but our human case does not have the other congenital deficits reported in the Lef1-null mouse. Bilateral agenesis of the hippocampal dentate gyrus, and apparent failure of regeneration of dentate granule cells from stem cells in adult life, may occur without overt clinical neurological deficits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms→French-language works237,207→