Role of Nitric Oxide Synthase, Cytochrome P-450, and Cyclooxygenase in the Inotropic and Lusitropic Cardiac Response to Increased Coronary Perfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although studies have reported that increase in coronary perfusion (CP) results in positive inotropic effects, the underlying mechanisms of these actions and possible alterations in myocardial diastolic function are not well defined. Hypothesis was that nitric oxide (NO) and derivatives of cytochrome (CYT) P-450 or cyclooxygenase (COX) might contribute to interplay between coronary and myocardial compartments in these conditions. Using isovolumically contracting, isolated perfused hamster heart model, coronary flow (CF) was increased mechanically, stepwise in the physiologic range (+2 to +10 ml/min), before and after inhibition of NO synthase by NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) (30 microM), CYT P-450 by SKF525A (1 microM), or COX by indomethacin (10 microM). CP pressure, left ventricular systolic pressure (VSP) and ventricular diastolic pressure (VDP), and heart rate (HR) were monitored continuously during the experiments. Mechanical increases in CF resulted in gradual change in CP pressure (+20% to +100%), left VSP (+5% to +40%) and VDP (+2% to +25%), whereas HR was not affected. In presence of l-NAME, the positive inotropic response and negative lusitropic effect of CF changes were similar. Exposure to SKF525A did not modify cardiac response to mechanical increases in CF. In presence of COX inhibitor indomethacin, left VSP rose to a level similar to that observed in control conditions, whereas VDP deteriorated further. These results suggest that mediators originating from NO synthase, CYT P-450, or COX do not contribute to positive inotropic response elicited by increased CP. However, COX derivatives seem to attenuate impairment of myocardial relaxation observed in these conditions. Such findings may have implications in development of therapeutics for patients with myocardial diastolic dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".