MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FLEXURAL OSCILLATIONS OF FLEXIBLE AIRFOILS IN SUBSONIC COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS

2009· article· en· W2317050444 on OpenAlexafffund
MATEESCU Dan

Bibliographic record

VenueINCAS BULLETIN · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAcademia Româna
KeywordsAirfoilCompressibilityMechanicsCompressible flowPhysicsAerospace engineeringAcousticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents simple and efficient analytical solutions for unsteady subsonic compressible flows past flexible airfoils executing low frequency oscillations.These analytical solutions are obtained with a method using velocity singularities related to the airfoil leading edge and ridges.The method has been validated for the pitching and plunging oscillations of the rigid airfoils by comparison with results based on Jordan's data for compressible flows and by comparison with the solutions obtained by Theodorsen, Postel & Leppert and Mateescu & Abdo for incompressible flows.The method has been applied to obtain efficient analytical solutions for the flexural oscillations of airfoils in compressible flows, which can be efficiently used in solving aeroelastic problems. Professor Carafoli's contributions to the aerodynamics of airfoils and wingsStarting from 1924, in Paris, Elie Carafoli made significant contributions to the aerodynamic studies of wings and airfoils, included in Aerodynamics of airplane wings [5], Theory of lifting airfoils [6], in which he presented the aerodynamics of airfoils with rounded trailing edge, named later Carafoli airfoils, Influence of ailerons on the aerodynamic characteristics of lifting surfaces [7], and in Experimental studies on monoplane wings [8].After 1928, he continued his research and academic activity in Romania, bringing new contributions to the aerodynamics of wings and airfoils in incompressible flows, which were mostly included in Aerodynamics [9], book also translated from Romanian into German and Russian.After 1950, Elie Carafoli developed a special interest for compressible flows and published High Speed Aerodynamics [10], initially in Romanian and then translated in English.He made, together with his collaborators, important contributions on the aerodynamics of wings and airfoils in supersonic flows, most of them included in the monograph Wing Theory in Supersonic Flow [11] published by Pergamon Press, to which the present author also collaborated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINCAS BULLETINSame topicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsFrench-language works237,207