MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317106443 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-1505

Abstract 1505: The role of cathepsin B in colorectal tumorigenesis

2011· article· en· W2317106443 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Bian, Sébastien Mongrain, François Boudreau, Nathalie Rivard

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathepsin BMolecular biologyCathepsin HCathepsin L1Small hairpin RNABiologyWestern blotAlternative splicingCathepsin LCathepsin SCathepsin EExonCancer researchCell cultureCathepsinGene knockdownCathepsin OGeneEnzymeBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many cancers express elevated protease levels which contribute to certain aspects of tumor behavior such as growth and metastatic spread. Specifically, elevation of the cysteine protease cathepsin B has been shown to correlate with malignant progression of tumors. The majority of reports on cathepsin B expression in tumors have focused on measurements of activity or protein staining. However, multiple transcripts species have been detected resulting from alternative splicing in the 5’- or 3-untranslated regions, and possibly the use of alternative promoter regions. The specific role of these variants remains to be established. Methods: Expression of cathepsin B was analyzed in normal human intestinal epithelial cells (HIEC) and colorectal cancer cell lines (Caco-2/15, HCT116, DLD1, HT29, SW480, T84, Colo205) by qPCR and Western blot. The role of cathepsin B was examined in HT29 and DLD1 cell lines through recombinant lentiviruses encoding anti-cathepsin B short hairpin RNA (shRNA). Results: RT-PCR analyses demonstrated that the levels of the full transcript for cathepsin B containing exons 1-12 (CB) were similar between normal and cancerous cell lines. By contrast, the splice variant lacking exons 2 and 3 (CB-2,3) was expressed only in cancer cells and in biopsies from human colorectal tumors when compared to the adjacent healthy tissues. Immunofluorescence studies showed that this novel tumor form of cathepsin B (CB-2,3) was associated with nuclei and mitrochondria while the full-length cathepsin B protein (CB) was found in the lysosomes. Western blot analyses on culture media showed a strong secretion of various cathepsin B isoforms by cancer cell lines. The lentiviral infection of a shRNA which specifically knocked-down cathepsin B expression, while decreasing enzyme activity in cell lysates, did not influence colorectal cancer cell proliferation under anchorage-dependent conditions. By contrast, decrease of cathepsin B expression in HT29 and DLD1 colon cancer cell lines resulted in a marked reduction of their capacity to grow in soft agar. Levels of β-catenin protein and phosphorylated ERK1/2 were not affected following cathepsin B silencing in contrast to phosphorylated Akt which was significantly reduced. Further, migration and invasion through Matrigel was reduced by 60% in cells expressing the shRNA against cathepsin B compared to cells expressing a control shRNA. Conclusion: These results suggest that the alternative splicing of cathepsin B could contribute to the aberrant intracellular trafficking and function of cathepsin B in colorectal cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1505. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1505

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207