Measurements of the Potentials of Zero Free Charge and Zero Total Charge for 1-thio- ± b<i>β</i>-D-glucose and DPTL Modified Au(111) Surface in Different Electrolyte Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The immersion method was used to measure the potential of zero free charge ( E pzfc ) of a bare Au(111) electrode and the electrode modified by self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of 1-thio- β -D-glucose ( β -Tg) and 2,3-di- O -phytanyl- sn -glycerol-1-tetraethylene glycol-D,L- α -lipoic acid ester (DPTL). The measurements were performed in three electrolyte solutions: 0.1 M NaH 2 PO 4 , 0.1 MKClO 4 and 0.1 M NaF. The E pzc of the Au(111) electrode has different values in these electrolyte solutions due to the specific adsorption of phosphate and fluoride anions on the Au(111) surface. In contrast, when the gold surface is covered by a SAM of β -Tg, the adsorption of anions is suppressed and similar values of E pzfc were measured in the three electrolytes. Additional chronocoulometric experiments were performed to determine the potentials of the zero total charge ( E pztc ) for the thiol covered electrode. Significant differences between numerical values of potentials of the zero free charge E pzfc and potentials of the zero total charge E pztc were observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".