MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317230602 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-3804

Abstract 3804: Rare DNA variants are enriched at the BARD1 locus and likely influence neuroblastoma susceptibility.

2013· article· en· W2317230602 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Wood, Trevor J. Pugh, Olena Morozova, Jan Köster, Jan J. Molenaar, Vanessa Pineros, Kristopher R. Bosse, Juan C. Perín, Sharon J. Diskin, Maura Diamond, Marco A. Marra, Matthew Meyerson, Rogier Versteeg, John M. Maris

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsExomeNonsense mutationGenome-wide association studySanger sequencingLocus (genetics)Exome sequencingSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneDNA sequencingMutationGenotypeMissense mutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) in neuroblastoma identified 8 regions where common polymorphisms are associated with neuroblastoma susceptibility. However, the biological mechanisms and causal SNPs are largely unknown. Rare variants, potentially in linkage with common polymorphisms but with a higher effect size, may contribute to cancer susceptibility at GWAS-defined loci and provide biological insight into mechanism. METHODS: To identify rare variants at neuroblastoma GWAS loci we performed ultradeep targeted resequencing of BARD1 and LMO1 on peripheral blood DNA using RainDance microdroplet RDT1000 PCR enrichment, and HiSeq2000 single end 100 bp reads. We aggregated existing whole-genome and exome sequence data from constitutional DNA of neuroblastoma cases (Molenaar et al, Nature 2012; NCI TARGET) on all replicated neuroblastoma GWAS regions. RESULTS: Exon sequence data were available for 517 cases for BARD1, and 330 cases for LMO1, LINC00340, LIN28B-HACE1, LMO1, DUSP12, DDX4-IL3RA, and HSB17B12 (all genes with replicated associations to NB). The highest frequency of rare potentially damaging variants occurred in BARD1 with 7/517 cases (1.4%) containing novel (n=4) or rare (n=3) variants as defined by ESP6500, 1000 genomes project, and dbSNP135. Rare variants at BARD1 were associated with homozygosity or heterozygosity for the protective alleles. Using SIFT, PolyPhen-2 or MutationTaster, 6/7 variants were predicted to be deleterious, including a nonsense mutation in the domain mediating BARD1-BRCA1 heterodimerization and a nonsense mutation in a BRCT domain implicated in homology directed repair. Sanger sequencing of tumor DNA and RNA confirmed both nonsense mutations were present in their respective primary tumors. HEK293 cells transfected with BARD1 nonsense variants showed decreased stabilization of BRCA1. CONCLUSION: Novel and potentially damaging mutations in BARD1 exons are present in the constitutional DNA of ∼1% of patients with neuroblastoma and may contribute to disease susceptibility. However, BARD1 rare variants were not tagged by the common risk alleles providing an alternative mechanism to prime neuroblasts towards transformation. Further functional work, expansion of the targeted resequencing discovery cohort as a prelude to a larger case-control comparison, and incorporation of ENCODE data into analysis of non-coding SNPs may provide critical insights into neuroblastoma pathogenesis. Citation Format: Andrew C. Wood, Trevor J. Pugh, Olena Morozova, Jan Koster, Jan J. Molenaar, Vanessa Pineros, Kristopher R. Bosse, Juan C. Perin, Sharon Diskin, Maura A. Diamond, Marco Marra, Matthew Meyerson, Rogier Versteeg, John M. Maris. Rare DNA variants are enriched at the BARD1 locus and likely influence neuroblastoma susceptibility. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3804. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-3804

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207