MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317256372 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31823cc2ea

Management of Chronic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Fixation

2012· review· en· W2317256372 on OpenAlex
Ken Ishii, Yoshiaki Toyama, Masaya Nakamura, Kazuhiro Chiba, Morio Matsumoto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSubluxationTorticollisDeformityArthrodesisSurgeryReduction (mathematics)Pathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series of chronic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) treated by a novel closed reduction method (remodeling therapy) and review of the literature. OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical features of chronic AARF and the rationale of the remodeling therapy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment strategy for chronic recurrent AARF remains controversial. Posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis has been widely used for recurrent unstable AARFs after the closed reduction, and a variety of posterior fusion techniques have been advocated. In contrast, several investigators reported a chronic AARF case treated by a simple traction or closed reduction followed by cervical immobilization. Previously, we have found that a deformity of the superior C2 facet joint (C2 facet deformity) on three dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) reconstructions is a risk factor for recurrent subluxation. In addition, the remodeling of this C2 facet deformity by careful closed manipulation followed by halo fixation (remodeling therapy) could prevent the recurrence of subluxation. METHODS: Twelve children with chronic AARF who sustained torticollis for an average of 4.4 months after the onset were referred to our clinic. The mean age at the initial visit was 7.8 years. All patients underwent the remodeling therapy as reported previously. Radiographic findings and clinical courses were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment methodology, pearls, and pitfalls of the remodeling therapy were discussed with review of the literature. RESULTS: 3D CT images before reduction revealed persistent atlantoaxial subluxation and the C2 facet deformity in the dislocated side in all cases. Follow-up 3D CT scans demonstrated the remodeling of the C2 facet deformity at an average of 2.4 months after successful reduction of subluxation. Neither recurrence of symptoms nor subluxation was observed at a mean follow-up of 42 months in any case. The cervical range of motion was 73.9° at the dislocated and 83.5° at the contra-dislocated side from the midline. CONCLUSION: Chronic irreducible and recurrent unstable AARF should be initially managed by remodeling therapy using the facet deformity sign as a clinical index, if the C1 and C2 have not been osseously fused.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it