MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P5-05-15: Transgenic Mice Expressing Either p200, p110 or p75 CUX1 Isoform Develop Mammary Tumors of Various Histological Types

2010· article· en· W2317259184 on OpenAlexaff
ZM Ramzdan, C. Linn Cadieux, Maria Drossos, Alain Nepveu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene isoformBiologyCancer researchGenetically modified mouseTransgenesisTransgeneMolecular biologyGeneGeneticsEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Short isoforms of the CUX1 homeodomain protein are overexpressed in breast tumors and cancer cell lines. The full-length CUX1 protein, p200 CUX1, is proteolytically processed into p110 CUX1 by a nuclear isoform of cathepsin L. Another isoform, p75 CUX1, was found to be aberrantly expressed in breast tumors. The full-length and short CUX1 isoforms exhibit distinct biochemical and cellular activities. They bind DNA differently and regulate transcription in different ways. Over-expression of p110 or p75 CUX1 accelerates the start of DNA replication, promotes genetic instability and stimulates cell motility. In contrast, the full-length p200 CUX1 isoform appears to be inactive in these cell-based assays. To assess and compare the ability of the full-length and short CUX1 isoforms in driving mammary tumor development, we used site-specific transgenesis into the hprt locus to generate transgenic mice expressing p200, p110 or 75 CUX1 under the control of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat. We report that mammary tumors of various histopathologies developed in all transgenic lines after a long latency period. Mammary tumors were classified as solid carcinomas with or without papillary differentiation, adenosquamous carcinomas, adenomyoepithelioma or tubular/acinar adenoma and many displayed pathophysiological features similar to that of human basal-like breast cancers. Interestingly, higher expression of erbB2 mRNA was seen in most tumors, not only solid carcinomas but also adenosquamous carcinomas, while higher expression of various Wnt genes and activation of the β-catenin pathway was observed primarily in adenosquamous carcinomas. Activation of erbB2 expression appeared to represent a cooperating event that occurred independently of CUX1. In contrast, chromatin immunoprecipitation, shRNA-mediated knockdown and reporter assays established that CUX1 is involved in the transcriptional regulation of several Wnt genes. Together these results support the notion that oncogenic activity of CUX1 can facilitate the establishment of a Wnt/β-catenin autocrine loop. To our surprise, transgenic mice expressing p200 CUX1 developed mammary tumors with a penetrance equivalent to that of p75 and p110 CUX1 transgenic mice. Preliminary results showed that the expression and activity of p110 CUX1 was elevated in tumors from p200 CUX1 transgenics. Accordingly, cathepsin L was over-expressed in 7 out of 8 tumors from p200 CUX1 transgenic mice, but in only 1 out 11 tumors from p110 CUX1 mice. Moreover, in a p200 CUX1 tumor an activating point mutation has been identified at codon 61 of the k-ras gene. Activation of the ras pathway has previously been shown to lead to over-expression of cathepsin L. These results suggest that molecular events that lead to cathepsin L overexpression cooperate in tumorigenicity by stimulating the proteolytic processing of p200 CUX1 into the active p110 CUX1 isoform. Overall, these results confirm the oncogenic potential of CUX1 in the mammary gland and reveal some of the cooperating events and molecular pathways involved in mammary tumorigenesis. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-15.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207