Early Experience with Laparoscopic Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe our minimally invasive technique and outline perioperative and medium-term outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (LIPAA) for ulcerative colitis. Data were obtained from a prospectively collected database of 13 LIPPA procedures performed for ulcerative colitis between May 1994 and November 2000. Medium-term quality-of-life follow-up was obtained by telephone interview. Eight males and five females had an LIPAA performed, all of whom had previously undergone total abdominal colectomy with ileostomy. Median operative time was 255 minutes (range, 200-398 minutes) with one conversion (8%) due to adhesions. There were no deaths or intraoperative complications; however, six patients experienced seven postoperative complications within 30 days of final closure of defunctioning ileostomy (two leaks, two wound infections, one pulmonary embolus, and two reoperations for small bowel obstruction). Median length of stay was 7 days (range, 5-13 days). Median follow-up was 24 months (range, 6-66 months). The median number of day and night bowel movements was 6.0 (range, 3-10) and 1.0 (range, 0-3), respectively, with five patients requiring medication to control frequency. None had incontinence of stool or retrograde ejaculation; however, one had occasional incontinence of gas, three had occasional nocturnal soiling, and one was impotent. Three patients (23%) had pouchitis, all treated successfully with oral antibiotics. All patients were satisfied with the outcome of their operation and all preferred their pouch to previous ileostomy. Patients reported their overall social, emotional, and physical well being to be satisfactory to excellent. Results of the SF-36, a generic quality-of-life survey, were similar to those from studies of patients following an open pelvic pouch procedure. The LIPAA is technically feasible in experienced centers. We believe that the technique is still evolving and that more time and experience is required to refine the procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".