MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317471189 · doi:10.2489/jswc.70.4.247

Using hedgerow biodiversity to enhance the carbon storage of farmland in the Fraser River delta of British Columbia

2015· article· en· W2317471189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryanna Thiel, Sean Smukler, Sarah E. Gergel, Christine Terpsma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Soil and Water Conservation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindbreakBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceCarbon sequestrationBiodiversityEcosystemVegetation (pathology)Soil carbonAgronomyAgroforestrySpecies richnessForestrySoil waterEcologyGeographyBiologyCarbon dioxideSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hedgerows (also known as field margins, shelterbelts, or windbreaks) have the potential to help mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural activities through carbon (C) sequestration in the woody biomass of trees and shrubs as well as in the soil. A first step to understanding the sequestration potential is to quantify the biomass C and soil C storage. In the Fraser Valley of British Columbia, Canada, a hedgerow stewardship program incentivizes farmers to plant hedgerows to create habitat for biodiversity conservation and to improve ecosystem services such as climate change mitigation. This study evaluated the efficacy of hedgerows to store C in woody biomass and soil relative to remnant hedgerows (RH) and neighboring production fields with annual crops. We measured soil C (equivalent soil mass) and soil aggregate stability in both hedgerows and production fields, while biomass C and species diversity were calculated for the trees and shrubs in the two hedgerow types. There was no significant difference in the biomass C in the two hedgerow types, despite age differences with planted hedgerows (PH) having a mean total above- and belowground biomass of 76 ± 32 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> (33.8 ± 14.2 tn C ac<sup>−1</sup>) and RH 124 ± 21 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> (55.3 ± 9.3 tn C ac<sup>−1</sup>). Aggregate stability was similar in both hedgerow types, and was significantly greater than neighboring production fields. Woody vegetation biodiversity was significantly greater in PH than RH for richness, Shannon, and Simpson measures. Planted hedgerows stored significantly greater soil C than RH to 1.2 t m<sup>−2</sup> (1.1 tn yd<sup>−2</sup>) standard soil mass with values being 175.9 ± 13.2 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> (78.4 ± 5.8 tn C ac<sup>−1</sup>) and 132.7 ± 7.3 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> (59.1 ± 3.2 tn C ac<sup>−1</sup>), respectively. Soil C in PH was 40% greater than that of their neighboring production fields. Soil C was significantly correlated with the Shannon and Simpson diversity of the hedgerow shrubs and trees indicating that planting hedgerows, with improved woody vegetation biodiversity, may have a positive effect on their greenhouse gas mitigation potential on farmland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Soil and Water ConservationSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207