Efficacy of once-weekly epoetin alfa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis are frequently treated with epoetin alfa (recombinant human erythropoietin, rHuEPO) for anemia. The aim of this study was to determine whether successful management of anemia could be maintained by changing the dosing schedule of epoetin alfa from 2 or 3 times per week to once-weekly administration via not only the subcutaneous (s.c.) but also the intravenous (i.v.) route. METHODS: Patients included in the study had hemodialysis for > 12 months, treatment with epoetin for > or = 6 months and adequate iron stores. The study consisted of a pre-study period (12 weeks), Phase I (4 weeks, patients continued prestudy regimen), Phase II (12 weeks, once-weekly i.v. or s.c. regimen with dose adjustments permitted to maintain target hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations) and Phase III (4 weeks, once-weekly i.v. or s.c. regimen without dose adjustments). RESULTS: The study was completed by 203 patients (per-protocol population: i.v. group, n = 115, s.c. group, n = 88). In the majority of patients (69.4% overall: i.v. group, 67.0%, s.c. group, 72.7%), the individual Phase I Hb concentrations were maintained within +/-1.0 g/dl (+/-10 g/l) during Phase III. In 79.3% of the patients (i.v. group, 75.7%, s.c. group, 84.1%), a stable Hb concentration (decrease of < or = 1 g/dl (< or = 10 g/l)) was maintained without statistically significant dose adjustments (82.4+/-33.8 - 86.8+/-42.1 IU/kg body weight/week). Hb concentrations decreased from 11.57+/-0.83 g/dl(115.7+/-8.3 g/l) in Phase I to 11.39+/-1.09 g/dl (113.9+/-10.9 g/l) in Phase III (p < 0.05) in the entire group. The weekly dose of epoetin alfa required to maintain the individual target Hb concentrations changed from 85.1+/-34.6 IU/kg in Phase I to 92.1+/-45.1 IU/kg in Phase III in the entire population (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With once-weekly administration of epoetin alfa, Hb concentrations can be maintained in the majority of stable hemodialysis patients, and only minimal dose adjustments are required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".