MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317493103 · doi:10.5414/cnp62440

Efficacy of once-weekly epoetin alfa

2004· article· en· W2317493103 on OpenAlex
Paul E. Barré, Helmut Reichel, Michael Suranyi, Cláudia Barth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nephrology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria HospitalRoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpoetin alfaRegimenAnemiaHemodialysisErythropoietinDosingInternal medicinePopulationGastroenterologyHemoglobinKidney diseaseSurgeryUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis are frequently treated with epoetin alfa (recombinant human erythropoietin, rHuEPO) for anemia. The aim of this study was to determine whether successful management of anemia could be maintained by changing the dosing schedule of epoetin alfa from 2 or 3 times per week to once-weekly administration via not only the subcutaneous (s.c.) but also the intravenous (i.v.) route. METHODS: Patients included in the study had hemodialysis for > 12 months, treatment with epoetin for > or = 6 months and adequate iron stores. The study consisted of a pre-study period (12 weeks), Phase I (4 weeks, patients continued prestudy regimen), Phase II (12 weeks, once-weekly i.v. or s.c. regimen with dose adjustments permitted to maintain target hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations) and Phase III (4 weeks, once-weekly i.v. or s.c. regimen without dose adjustments). RESULTS: The study was completed by 203 patients (per-protocol population: i.v. group, n = 115, s.c. group, n = 88). In the majority of patients (69.4% overall: i.v. group, 67.0%, s.c. group, 72.7%), the individual Phase I Hb concentrations were maintained within +/-1.0 g/dl (+/-10 g/l) during Phase III. In 79.3% of the patients (i.v. group, 75.7%, s.c. group, 84.1%), a stable Hb concentration (decrease of < or = 1 g/dl (< or = 10 g/l)) was maintained without statistically significant dose adjustments (82.4+/-33.8 - 86.8+/-42.1 IU/kg body weight/week). Hb concentrations decreased from 11.57+/-0.83 g/dl(115.7+/-8.3 g/l) in Phase I to 11.39+/-1.09 g/dl (113.9+/-10.9 g/l) in Phase III (p < 0.05) in the entire group. The weekly dose of epoetin alfa required to maintain the individual target Hb concentrations changed from 85.1+/-34.6 IU/kg in Phase I to 92.1+/-45.1 IU/kg in Phase III in the entire population (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With once-weekly administration of epoetin alfa, Hb concentrations can be maintained in the majority of stable hemodialysis patients, and only minimal dose adjustments are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it