MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317493647 · doi:10.1097/pgp.0000000000000263

p16 Immunostaining Allows for Accurate Subclassification of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Into HPV-Associated and HPV-Independent Cases

2015· article· en· W2317493647 on OpenAlexaff
Angela Cheng, Anthony N. Karnezis, Suzanne Jordan, Naveena Singh, Jessica N. McAlpine, C. Blake Gilks

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyH&E stainImmunohistochemistryVulvar intraepithelial neoplasiaImmunostainingSquamous intraepithelial lesionIntraepithelial neoplasiaConcordanceVulvar DiseasesCarcinoma in situCarcinomaVulvar cancerAnatomical pathologyMedicineBiologyVulvaCancerCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaInternal medicineCervical cancerProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to compare morphologic assessment and p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the determination of human papilloma virus (HPV) status in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). A total of 201 invasive VSCC cases were classified as "HPV-associated" when warty/basaloid VSCC or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3) was observed, or "HPV-independent" in the presence of well-differentiated keratinizing invasive SCC or differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. For p16 IHC, strong nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of all cells in at least the lowermost third of the epithelium was scored as positive. All cases with discrepant HPV predictions by hematoxylin and eosin morphology versus p16 IHC were further analyzed by polymerase chain reaction for HPV DNA. On the basis of hematoxylin and eosin morphologic assessment, 50/201 tumors showed features suggestive of HPV-associated, and 47 of those showed p16 immunoreactivity (94% concordance). Of the 146 cases considered HPV-independent based on hematoxylin and eosin, 115 (79%) showed negative p16 immunostaining. Thus 83% (162/196) concordance between morphologic assessment and p16 IHC was observed, overall. In 34 cases, where morphologic assessment and p16 IHC did not agree, HPV polymerase chain reaction agreed with p16 IHC in 32/34 (94%). The sensitivity and specificity of p16 IHC in classification of VSCC as HPV-independent or HPV-associated was 100% and 98.4%, respectively. Morphologic assessment and p16 IHC are concordant in classifying VSCC as HPV-independent or HPV-associated in a majority of cases (83%). Most of the discrepant cases are p16-positive well-differentiated keratinizing VSCC, and HPV polymerase chain reaction supports classification of a large majority of these (94%) as HPV-associated. p16 IHC is validated as an accurate surrogate marker for determination of HPV status in VSCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecological PathologySame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207