MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317559300 · doi:10.1021/mp3000502

PAMAM Dendrimer-Baculovirus Nanocomplex for Microencapsulated Adipose Stem Cell-Gene Therapy: <i>In Vitro</i> and <i>in Vivo</i> Functional Assessment

2012· article· en· W2317559300 on OpenAlexafffund
Arghya Paul, Wei Shao, Sana Abbasi, Dominique Shum‐Tim, Satya Prakash

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pharmaceutics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsStem cellAdipose tissueTransplantationGenetic enhancementChemistryGene deliveryIn vitroVascular endothelial growth factorIn vivoMolecular biologyCell biologyCancer researchVEGF receptorsBiologyBiochemistryMedicineGeneInternal medicineBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aims to develop a new stem cell based gene delivery system consisting of human adipose tissue derived stem cells (hASCs) genetically modified with self-assembled nanocomplex of recombinant baculovirus and PAMAM dendrimer (Bac-PAMAM) to overexpress the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Cells were enveloped into branched PEG surface functionalized polymeric microcapsules for efficient transplantation. In vitro analysis confirmed efficient transduction of hASCs expressing 7.65 ± 0.86 ng functionally active VEGF per 10(6) microencapsulated hASCs (ASC-VEGF). To determine the potential of the developed system, chronically infarcted rat hearts were treated with either empty microcapsules (MC), microencapsulated hASCs expressing MGFP reporter protein (MC+ASC-MGFP), or MC+ASC-VEGF, and analyzed for 10 weeks. Post-transplantation data confirmed higher myocardial VEGF expressions with significantly enhanced neovasculature in the MC+ASC-VEGF group. In addition, the cardiac performance, as measured by percentage ejection fraction, also improved significantly in the MC+ASC-VEGF group (48.6 ± 6.1%) compared to that in MC+ASC-MGFP (38.8 ± 5.3%) and MC groups (31.5 ± 3.3%). Collectively, these data demonstrate the feasibility of this system for improved stem cell therapy applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PharmaceuticsSame topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207