Electrolyzed Water Generated Using a Circulating Reactor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Electrolyzed water offers several advantages over other sanitizers for sanitation of both food contact and non-contact surfaces. However, current electrolyzed water-generating process has low fluid output. To overcome such limitations, a circulating electrolyzed water-generating system has been developed in this study. The effects of NaCl/HCl concentration and electrolysis time were investigated. The free chlorine form (HClO and ClO – ) of circulating electrolyzed water, and NaClO with the available chlorine concentrations of 50, 100, 200 mg/L were analyzed by using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer. The results show that the main chlorine form was HClO when the pH of solution was 6.44–6.53. The only ClO – in NaClO solutions when the pH of solution is 11.90. With the dilution of circulating electrolyzed water, the HClO concentration decreased while its proportion account for total available chlorine concentration increased (from 56.99% to 74.29%). The results indicated the potential application of diluted circulating electrolyzed water with high available chlorine concentration. The developed circulating electrolyzed water system in this study could be considered as a potential sanitizer due to its high stability, strong antimicrobial activity with high concentration of HClO and minimized equipment requirements for production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it