MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317627497 · doi:10.1097/bcr.0000000000000102

Fibrocytes Participate in the Development of Heterotopic Ossification

2014· article· en· W2317627497 on OpenAlexaff
Abelardo Medina, Zengshuan Ma, Mathew Varkey, Hongbin Liu, Takashi Iwashina, Jie Ding, Edward E. Tredget

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterotopic ossificationFibrocyteMedicineBone marrowProgenitor cellPathologyOssificationFlow cytometryStem cellImmunofluorescenceCD34Cell biologyImmunologyAnatomyBiologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a complication of musculoskeletal injury characterized by the formation of mature bone in soft tissues. The etiology of HO is unknown. We investigated the role of bone marrow derived progenitor cells in HO pathophysiology. We isolated the cells from HO specimens by cell explantation. Using flow cytometry and immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that 35 to 65% of the HO cells exhibit a bone marrow derived fibrocyte profile consisting in spindle-shaped morphology associated with type 1 pro-collagen and LSP1 expression. When cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium, active machinery for bone mineralization (high gene expression of Anx2, TNAP, and Pit-1), and calcium/phosphate deposits were found. Interestingly, interferon-alpha 2b significantly reduced the proliferation rate and COL1 gene expression in HO cells. We have characterized a novel subset of bone marrow derived progenitor cells in the HO specimens. The findings from this research study will provide new insights into the development of HO in burn patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicHeterotopic Ossification and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207