MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multiple Myeloma

2014· article· en· W2317757653 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert H. Carlson

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Times · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalidomideBortezomibMedicineLenalidomideMultiple myelomaMelphalanOncologyBendamustineInternal medicineCarfilzomibPharmacologyLymphomaRituximab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FigureNEW YORK—Treatment regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma have become plentiful in the past few years, with a panoply of options. Consequently, “the old rules no longer apply,” says James Berenson, MD, President and Chief Medical Officer of the Institute for Myeloma and Bone Cancer Research in West Hollywood, Calif., speaking here at the International Congress on Hematologic Malignancies. Before anything, he said, it is paramount to confirm disease progression—“so don't rely on just one lab value, which might be subjective.” His recommendations for new or at least newer rules: Dose escalation can be helpful. Patients who have disease progression from a drug at one dose may respond to the same drug at a higher dose, as with lenalidomide or thalidomide. “Antibiotics may work, believe it or not,” he said, specifically mentioning clarithromycin. Try to use drugs the patient has not received before. However, progression on one drug in combination does not mean that drug will not be effective with another agent. For example, patients with disease progression from bortezomib with melphalan often respond to bortezomib with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, he said. Even different drugs in the same class may be active—for example, patients who do not respond to bortezomib-melphalan may respond to other alkylating agents such as bendamustine or cyclophosphamide; disease that fails to respond to lenalidomide may respond to thalidomide and vice versa; and bortezomib combinations that have been ineffective may produce responses with replacement with carfilzomib. Although regimens may be ineffective alone, when combined they may be effective: Patients who do not respond to lenalidomide-dexamethasone or to bortezomib-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin often respond to the combination of both regimens. The same combination may be effective again if the patient has not received the combination in a long time. Be careful interpreting renal insufficiency—often it may actually be due to anemia or diabetes rather than to myeloma, he said. European/Canadian study data may not be relevant to U.S. patients, who have many more treatment options. FigureJAMES BERENSON, MD. JAMES BERENSON, MDAfter his talk, he was asked from the audience about transplants. “The era of transplants is over,” he replied. “I do not do transplants anymore. “Myeloma is a marathon, not a sprint. It's better to run a 10-minute mile and finish the race than run a four-minute mile and drop out at mile 5,” said Berenson, a marathon runner himself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncology TimesSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207