MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317774139 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-3952

Abstract 3952: New advances in regulation of senescence by PML and the PML nuclear bodies

2012· article· en· W2317774139 on OpenAlexaff
Mariana D. Acevedo Aauino, Véronique Bourdeau, Mathieu Vernier, Gerardo Ferbeyre

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromyelocytic leukemia proteinSenescenceCancer researchBiologyDNA damageCell biologyCyclin-dependent kinaseKinaseNuclear proteinCancerCell cycleGeneDNATranscription factorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Senescence is a cellular defense mechanism activated by short telomeres, DNA damage or expression of oncogenes. The program includes the expression of high levels of the promyelocytic leukemia protein PML that form nuclear spherical bodies, known as PML-nuclear bodies (PML-NB). The expression of PML in normal fibroblasts is sufficient to induce senescence while genetic inactivation of PML inhibits the process. These results suggest that PML is a critical component of the senescence tumor suppressor mechanism. Accordingly PML is poorly expressed in malignant human tumors but highly expressed in benign tumors. We recently discovered a new mechanism of regulation of RAS-induced senescence by PML, which implicates the recruitment of the RB/E2F complex to the PML-NB via RB-PML interaction. This leads to inhibition of cell cycle and DNA repair genes, DNA damage, p53 activation and ultimately to senescence. We show now that the cyclin dependent kinase CDK4 blocks the ability of PML to regulate E2F gene expression and senescence and that CDK inhibitors potentiate the ability of PML to restore the senescence program in tumor cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3952. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3952

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207