MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W231778016

RFID and the EPC Network as Enablers of Mobile Business: A Case Study in the Retail Industry.

2006· article· en· W231778016 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Fosso Wamba, Ygal Bendavid, Louis Lefebvre, Élisabeth Lefebvre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association for Information Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainBusiness processRadio-frequency identificationProcess managementComputer scienceSupply chain managementBusinessContext (archaeology)Computer securityMarketingWork in process
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides some insights into Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology and the Electronic Product Code (EPC) Network and investigates their impacts as enablers of Mobile Business (M-Business)." M-business is the application infrastructure required to maintain business relationship and sell information, services, and commodities by means of the mobile devices" .Based on empirical data gathered from four tightly interrelated firms from three layers of a supply chain, several scenarios integrating RFID and the EPC Network have been tested in a pilot project and evaluated.In the context of warehousing activities in one specific retail supply chain, the results indicate that i) the business process approach seems quite appropriate to capture the real potential of RFID and the EPC Network; ii) they can improve the " shipping" , the " receiving" , the " put away" processes and allow " in transit visibility" , iii) they offer opportunities for process optimization through the automation or cancellation of non value added processes, and through the emergence of new " smart processes", iv) they foster a higher level of information synchronization, visibility and sharing between supply chain members; and v) they enable supply chain members to leverage their existing IS investments.The paper helps to improve our understanding of the real potential of RFID and the EPC Network for mobile business processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association for Information SystemsSame topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207