Resonance fluorescence with bichromatic excitation and nonresonant squeezed reservoir: iterative approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An iterative approach, not restricted to field strength nor to resonance conditions, is used to solve the nonautonomous Bloch equations modeling the interaction of a bichromatically driven two-level atom in the presence of an off-resonant broadband squeezed vacuum (SV) radiation reservoir. The system parameters are chosen such that the absolute difference between the iterative and (exact) numerical solutions is [Formula: see text](10 −2 ) or less. For some limiting cases, range of validity of the iterative procedure is estimated analytically. The derived analytical solutions are used to calculate the transient fluorescent spectrum. Some previously obtained results (both experimental and theoretical) in the normal vacuum case are recovered. In the SV case, with strong resonant (off-resonant) bichromatic field strength, the transient spectrum shows many symmetrical (asymmetrical) resonances of weights and locations dependent on the SV detuning parameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".