MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317907190 · doi:10.1149/1.2729349

Fabrication of Anode Supported Direct Ammonia Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Based on Proton Conducting Y-doped BaCeO3 Electrolyte

2007· article· en· W2317907190 on OpenAlexaff
Yeong Yoo, Mark Tuck, Nguon Lim, Andrew McFarlan, N. Maffei

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaDalhousie UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteAnodeMaterials scienceOpen-circuit voltageAmmoniaProton conductorNon-blocking I/OSolid oxide fuel cellElectrochemistryOxideAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringInorganic chemistryElectrodeChemistryVoltageMetallurgyElectrical engineeringCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high performance anode supported single cells for ammonia fueled SOFCs comprising of BSCF (Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3- δ)//BCY//NiO-BCY have been fabricated by co-pressing for depositing 50 µm thin film electrolytes. The electrolytes prepared by co-pressing technology were fully dense with no formation of secondary phases and observed to be crack-free. The electrochemical performance of single cells was characterized at the temperature 600-700 {degree sign}C under humid 75% H2 in N2 (3% H2O) similar to cracked ammonia as the fuel gas and air as the oxidant gas at a gas flow rate of 100 mL min-1. The open circuit voltages were around 1.02 V at 600 {degree sign}C indicating little gas leakage or mixed conduction through the electrolyte. Maximum power densities of 220, 190 and 160 mW cm- 2 from single cells were obtained at 700, 650 and 600 {degree sign}C, respectively under humid 75% H2 in N2 (3% H2O) and air.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207