MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P-190 Use of a Novel Activation Assay to Detect Increased Flagellin-Reactive CD4+ T cells in Peripheral Blood from Crohnʼs Disease Patients

2013· article· en· W2317990715 on OpenAlexaffabout
Garcia Rosa, Himmel Megan, Jamie Koenekoop, Seidman Ernest, Levings Megan, Steiner Theodore

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToxoidFlagellinImmunologyMedicineIL-2 receptorPopulationFlow cytometryAntibodyTetanusCD3T cellImmune systemInternal medicineCD8ReceptorImmunizationVaccination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anti-commensal immune responses are abnormally active in patients with IBD. About half of people with Crohn's disease (CD) produce antibodies to bacterial flagellins. However, previous attempts to demonstrate T cell responses against these flagellins have been largely unsuccessful. We used a newly described dual activation-marker flow cytometric assay to quantify flagellin-reactive CD4+ T cells in patients with CD compared to controls. Consenting patients with CD were recruited from the McGill University Health Center IBC clinic. Clinical data collected included age, sex, disease phenotype, and current treatment. Controls were healthy volunteers without a history of IBD. Whole blood from venipuncture was stimulated with 1 µg/mL of LPS-free flagellin (A4-Fla2 or E. coli H18 FliC) for 48 hour and then stained for flow cytometry. The CD3+CD4+ population within the live cell gate was analyzed for expression of CD25 and CD134 (OX40) and the percentage of double positive cells was recorded. Cells were stimulated with tetanus toxoid or phytohemagglutinin as positive controls. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare % CD25+CD134+ cells between groups. The assay has low background, with unstimulated samples showing very few double positive cells (median 0.07%, IQR 0.118%). Tetanus toxoid stimulation led to double positive cells in about half of tested subjects (median 0.425%, IQR 0.87%). LPS stimulation at up to 10 µg/mL did not produce double positive cells, suggesting that the assay reflects TCR-dependent stimulation rather than nonspecific toll-like receptor effects. This is supported by our observation that responses to E. coli FliC (a strong TLR5 agonist) were undistinguishable from those against a transposon mutant of FliC, 2H3, which lacks TLR5 stimulatory activity. Most healthy controls had no discernible increase in double-positive CD4+ cells after stimulation with Fla2 (median 0.08%, IQR 0.32%) or FliC (median 0.11%, IQR 0.431%). In contrast, CD patients had significantly higher percentages of double positive cells after stimulation with Fla2 (median 0.24, IQR .505; P = 0.002) and FliC (median 0.30, IQR 0.53; P = 0.004). Elevated double positive cells were seen in patients with isolated luminal disease (Fla2: P = 0.010; FliC: P = 0.012) as well as those with complicated stricturing/perforating disease, in whom anti-flagellin antibodies are reported to be more prevalent (Fla2: P = 0.046; FliC: P = 0.016). Differences between these 2 groups were not significant. The type of current treatment (5-ASA, immunomodulator, or anti-TNF) also did not significantly affect the percentage of double-positive cells after flagellin stimulation. We used a highly sensitive and specific assay for CD4+ T cell activation to demonstrate for the first time a statistically significant increase in anti-flagellin T cell responses in patients with CD. Responses were similarly directed against E. coli FliC and the A4-Fla2 flagellins, unlike antibody responses, which more strongly target the Fla2-like Clostridiales flagellins. Since helper T cells are important both in optimal production of antibodies and cytotoxic T cell responses, we hypothesize that flagellin-reactive CD4+ cells play a pathogenic role in CD. Future studies will be needed to examine the phenotype of these double-positive cells and their prevalence in intestinal tissue and draining lymph nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207