MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318333128 · doi:10.1021/jz401310j

Dissociative Adsorption of Nitric Acid at the Surface of Amorphous Solid Water Revealed by X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

2013· article· en· W2318333128 on OpenAlexaff
Guillaume Marcotte, Patrick Ayotte, Azzedine Bendounan, Fausto Sirotti, C. Laffon, P. Parent

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitric acidAdsorptionDissociation (chemistry)ChemistryAmorphous solidSpectroscopyMetastabilityIonic bondingIonic liquidAbsorption spectroscopyInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryIonCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A spectral feature unique to the molecularly adsorbed state of HNO 3 is found in X-ray absorption spectroscopy. This distinctive signature reveals the extent to which nitric acid is ionically dissociated upon its adsorption on amorphous solid water (ASW) at low coverage and low temperature. Thermal annealing induces irreversible proton transfer from HNO 3(ads), demonstrating that it is metastable with respect to ionic dissociation below 100 K at the surface of ASW. The slight decrease in ionic dissociation propensity reported for nitric acid at liquid water surfaces thus appears to be overwhelmed by the strong exothermicity of this reaction as its entropic inhibition becomes increasingly suppressed the lower the temperature. These findings may be relevant for atmospheric chemistry processes involving nitric acid, which should thus, according to thermodynamic considerations, be expected to behave as a strong acid at the surface of supercooled aerosols and of the quasi-liquid layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207