MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318400376 · doi:10.1103/physreve.90.020601

Biomolecule transport across biomembranes in the presence of crowding: Polymer translocation driven by concentration and disorder gradients

2014· article· en· W2318400376 on OpenAlexaff
Hendrick W. de Haan, Gary W. Slater

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoporeChemical physicsPolymerObstacleBiomoleculeMembraneChromosomal translocationBiophysicsMaterials sciencePhysicsNanotechnologyChemistryBiologyNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transport of biomolecules across biomembranes occurs in a complex environment where the fluid on both sides of the membrane contains many inclusions. We investigate the translocation of a polymer through a nanopore in such crowded environments via computer simulations. Modeling intracellular and extracellular inclusions as spherical obstacles, the emergence of an entropic driving force is demonstrated for (i) a gradient in the number of obstacles on either side of the pore and (ii) having the obstacles in an ordered arrangement on one side and disordered on the other. With a directional preference of ≈90% of events occurring towards the disordered side and a reduction in the translocation time of ≈30%, the latter case represents a manifestation of entropic trapping. Simple estimates for the magnitude of the driving force are developed for both cases. The effect of allowing the obstacles to move as well as systems containing opposing concentration and disorder gradients are also explored. Demonstrating a robust conclusion that translocation to lower obstacle densities and higher degrees of disorder will be accelerated, these results suggest that accounting for such effects will be critical in developing a realistic model of in vivo translocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesFrench-language works237,207