MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318503364 · doi:10.1149/05336.0041ecst

The Effect of Water Addition on Zn/Zn(II) Redox Reactions in Room Temperature Ionic Liquids with Bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide Anions

2013· article· en· W2318503364 on OpenAlexafffund
Min Xu, Douglas G. Ivey, Wei Qu, Zhong Xie, Xiao‐Zi Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicIonic liquids properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsIonic liquidRedoxInorganic chemistryChemistryElectrochemistryOverpotentialMicrocrystallineZincElectrolyteIonic conductivityImideElectrodeCatalysisOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) as potential electrolytes for rechargeable Zn-anode batteries suffers from a disadvantage of insufficient conductivity. In this study, water added ionic liquids composed of pyrrolidinium/imidazolium cations and bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide anions were investigated with regard to their physicochemical behavior and the response of Zn/Zn(II) redox reactions. Peak conductivity was achieved by adding water in the range of 2.0-2.5 wt%. The best kinetic properties for Zn/Zn(II) redox, including decreased redox overpotential and on average three times the diffusion rate and exchange current density, were also achieved for this composition range. Water also affected the morphology of Zn electrodeposited from RTILs. Zinc deposits grew from nanocrystalline to microcrystalline in scale with poorer adhesion in water added RTILs with pyrrolidinium cations. However, Zn deposits obtained from water added RTILs with imidazolium cations showed no obvious change in size and adhesion properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicIonic liquids properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207