MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318683886 · doi:10.1097/rlu.0b013e3181ef09b1

Hepatitis C–Related Primary Effusion Lymphoma of the Pleura and Peritoneum, Imaged With F-18 FDG PET/CT

2010· article· en· W2318683886 on OpenAlexaff
William Makis, Jerry Stern

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nuclear Medicine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary effusion lymphomaAscitesPeritoneumPleural effusionSerous fluidLymphomaEffusionOrganomegalyPathologyCirrhosisGastroenterologyRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary Effusion Lymphoma (PEL) is a rare form of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma that involves serous body cavities (pleural, pericardial, or peritoneal) with lymphomatous effusions in the absence of lymphadenopathy or organomegaly. Although it was seen mostly in HIV-positive patients, it has recently been reported in HIV-negative patients with chronic Hepatitis B or C infections. PEL is associated with human herpes virus type-8 infection, often presents with rapidly progressive effusions and generally has a poor prognosis. This is a case of a 65-year-old HIV-negative man with Hepatitis C cirrhosis, who presented with abdominal pain. An F-18 FDG PET/CT showed marked ascites and pleural effusions with increased F-18 FDG uptake in the pleura and peritoneum on the left side. Analysis of the cells in the peritoneal fluid revealed a human herpes virus 8-positive PEL of the peritoneum. As a result the patient was no longer considered a liver transplant candidate and died 2 weeks after the diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Nuclear MedicineSame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207