MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318714868 · doi:10.1093/isle/ist144

Music and the Skillful Listener: American Women Compose the Natural World

2014· article· en· W2318714868 on OpenAlex
Kate Galloway

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural (archaeology)EthnomusicologyMusicologyAestheticsScholarshipEcofeminismPopular musicDepictionSociologyMusicalVisual artsArtHistoryEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent “sonic turn” in environmental humanities embraces current interdisciplinary work in the fields of sound studies, sensory studies, and notably musicology and ethnomusicology, the home-fields within which Denise Von Glahn's Music and the Skillful Listener is situated. Von Glahn articulates the multifarious ways American women composers engage with the natural world, stating: “Music as a sounding, temporal art provides a sympathetic expressive mode for suggesting the essence of the natural world. It can get beyond words and offer a moving account denied [by] more static arts” (6). Music and the Skillful Listener is the first monograph in the series Music, Nature, Place, which is devoted to interdisciplinary scholarship that addresses the intersections of music, nature, and place. Von Glahn situates her compositional subjects alongside the rich tradition of female nature writers, ecofeminism, and environmental advocacy. Illustrating how American women composers contribute to and are influenced by the natural world, she outlines the ways American environs have shaped individual and national music identities. What results is a multilayered depiction of how women composers' sociocultural circumstances and exposure to intimately experienced—often “smaller”—nature has produced generations of “skillful listeners” whose personalized ecological consciousness shapes their aesthetic choices. Just as the terms “nature” and “environment” have no single definition in ecocriticism, no single compositional technique in music reflects the natural world. Von Glahn clearly conveys this sonic diversity through case studies of what seem to be demographically homogenous female composers, exemplifying how diversely these composers conceptualize nature, view themselves in relationship to the natural world and its nonhuman components, and compose music that reflects their sensory engagements with place. Chronologically organized, the book treats each composer—Amy Beach, Marion Bauer, Louise Talma, Pauline Oliveros, Joan Tower, Ellen Taaffe Zwilich, Victoria Bond, Libby Larsen, and Emily Doolittle—in detail, and Von Glahn sketches how the works of each reflect her time- and place-specific understanding of nature. Collectively, their output elucidates how their personal and societal environmental ethics and their environments shaped their aesthetics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it