MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318925169 · doi:10.2514/6.2002-1625

Active Robust Vibration Control of a Circular Plate Structure Using Piezoelectric Actuators

2002· article· en· W2318925169 on OpenAlexaff
Yan‐Ru Hu, Alfred Ng

Bibliographic record

Venue43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibration controlActuatorPiezoelectricityVibrationActive vibration controlControl theory (sociology)Robust controlPiezoelectric sensorAcousticsMaterials scienceComputer scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysicsControl (management)Control systemElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flexible structures are extensively used in many space applications, for example, space based radar antennae, space robotic systems, and space station, etc. The flexibility of these space structures results in problems of structural vibration and shape deformation, etc. In recent years, active control methods have been developed to suppress structural vibration and improve the performance of these flexible space structures. In this paper, we developed an approach for active vibration control of flexible structures with integrated piezoelectric actuators using control theory. First, dynamic models for a flexible circular plate with integrated piezoelectric actuators and sensors are derived using the Rayleigh-Ritz method. An active robust controller is designed to suppress vibration of the circular plate. Robustness of the control system of the circular plate is discussed for the model parameter uncertainty. This active robust vibration control method is tested via experimental implementation. The experimental results show that the proposed robust active control method is efficient for active vibration suppression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials ConferenceSame topicAeroelasticity and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207