Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| July 01, 2013 ATLAS OF NON-SILICATE MINERALS IN THIN SECTION By Joan Carles Melgarejo, Robert F. Martin. . ( 2011) The Canadian Mineralogist Special Publication 7. , 522 p. hardcover, DVD-ROM, Mineralogical Association of Canada, Québec. US$125.00 (outside Canada), CDN$125.00 (in Canada) (member price US$100.00/CDN$100.00) Price for students US$100.00 (outside Canada), CDN$100.00 (in Canada) (member price US$80.00/CDN$80.00). ISBN: 978-0-921294-51-1. Hiltrud Müller-Sigmund Hiltrud Müller-Sigmund Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, (Mineralogy-Geochemistry), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar American Mineralogist (2013) 98 (7): 1375–1376. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2013.620 Article history first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Hiltrud Müller-Sigmund; ATLAS OF NON-SILICATE MINERALS IN THIN SECTION. American Mineralogist 2013;; 98 (7): 1375–1376. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2013.620 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyAmerican Mineralogist Search Advanced Search The atlas is an impressive large format (11.5 × 8.5″) volume and is No. 7 of The Canadian Mineralogist’s series of Special Publications. It builds on an existing atlas written in both Spanish and Catalan languages. On its more than 500 pages, the atlas presents chemical, structural, optical, and paragenetical information plus thin-section micrographs for 408 different mineral species, all of which are non-opaque non-silicates. The atlas includes a DVD-ROM with all micrographs. The authors, Joan Carles Melgarejo (Barcelona, Spain) and Robert F. Martin (Montreal, Canada), are recognized and experienced mineralogists, who revised this book in cooperation with several... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.122 | 0.090 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".