Hydrogen Generation and Coke Formation over a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst under Fuel Rich Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydrogen production via hydrocarbon steam reforming and water gas shift reactions was investigated over a monolith-supported Pt-based diesel oxidation catalyst. The evaluation included comparison between constantly rich gas composition conditions and cycling between rich gas conditions and an inert stream. Analysis was performed along the catalyst length at temperatures ranging from 200 to 500 °C. During the constant inlet composition experiments, C 3 H 6 steam reforming started at 375 °C, while dodecane steam reforming began at 450 °C, and resulted in less hydrogen produced. With a mixture of C 3 H 6 and dodecane, hydrogen production originated solely from C 3 H 6 steam reforming and, under otherwise identical conditions, was less than that observed with only C 3 H 6, but higher than that with only dodecane. Hydrogen production from the water gas shift reaction was higher than that observed with hydrocarbon steam reforming and started at 225 °C. During cycling experiments, hydrogen production via hydrocarbon steam reforming was higher than that observed during the constant inlet composition experiments. This improvement was observed at all temperatures. Temperature programmed oxidation experiments performed after steam reforming indicate coke formed on the catalyst surface during steam reforming, and that the coke deposits were primarily toward the upstream portion of the catalyst. The data also show that the reason for better performance during cyclic operation is that less coke was deposited compared to that during noncyclic experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".