MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319008948 · doi:10.1139/v11-068

A theoretical investigation of tetrahydroquinoline dyes with different spacers used for sensitized solar cells

2011· article· en· W2319008948 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMoietyDensity functional theoryTime-dependent density functional theoryThiopheneAbsorption spectroscopyExcited stateAbsorption (acoustics)PhotochemistryElectron transferAtomic electron transitionElectron donorElectron acceptorDye-sensitized solar cellSolvent effectsSemiconductorBand gapSolventComputational chemistrySpectral linePhysical chemistryElectrodeElectrolyteStereochemistryOrganic chemistryAtomic physicsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The molecular structures and absorption spectra of three tetrahydroquinoline dyes (C2–1, C1–1, and C1–5) with a tetrahydroquinoline moiety as the electron donor, a cyanoacrylic acid moiety as the electron acceptor, and different thiophene-containing electron spacers were investigated by density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT). The calculated geometries indicate that a strong conjugation is formed in the dyes and the conjugate length increases with the increase of spacer length. The interfacial charge transfer between the semiconductor electrode and the tetrahydroquinoline dyes are electron-injection processes from the excited dyes to the semiconductor conduction band. The simulated absorption bands are assigned to π–π* transitions, which exhibit appreciable red-shift with respect to the experimental bands owing to the lack of direct solute–solvent interaction and the inherent approximations in TD-DFT. Moreover, the effect of different spacers on the molecular structures, absorption spectra, and photovoltaic performance were comparatively discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it