Growth During and After a Trial of Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone 1-29 in Children with Idiopathic Short Stature or Growth Hormone Neurosecretory Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growth promoting effects of once nightly subcutaneous injections of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) 1-29 (30 microg/kg) for 6 months were studied in 16 slowly growing prepubertal children with idiopathic short stature (ISS; Group 1) and 8 similar children with growth hormone neurosecretory dysfunction (GHND; Group 2). Each child underwent endogenous growth hormone evaluation using both pharmacological and physiological testing; each had stimulated values > 10 microg/l and were subsequently placed into one of two groups based on pooled 12-hour overnight GH of < or > or = 3 microg/l. Each patient was followed every three months for one year. There were no significant differences in the two groups throughout the study with the exception of the endogenous GH levels. Both groups responded to GHRH therapy with similar significant increases in their rates of growth. Although a subset of patients (6 of 21) continued to grow at a rate significantly greater than the pre-therapy rate of growth, overall rates of growth were not significantly different from the pre-therapy growth rates 6 months following the discontinuation of GHRH treatment. We conclude that GHRH 1-29, given in the doses provided, leads to similar changes in growth rates in short, slowly growing children who are GH sufficient and those with GHND. Despite prior reports to the contrary, GHND patients do not experience a sustained increased in growth rate upon discontinuation of GHRH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".