MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319065609 · doi:10.1021/jp203913n

Ion Induced Dipole Clusters H<sub><i>n</i></sub><sup>–</sup>(3 ≤<i>n</i>-odd ≤ 13): Density Functional Theory Calculations of Structure and Energy

2011· article· en· W2319065609 on OpenAlexaff
Lulu Huang, Chérif F. Matta, Lou Massa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDipoleIonAtomic physicsBasis setDensity functional theoryValence electronPhysicsElectronChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate anew the possible equilibrium geometries of ion induced dipole clusters of hydrogen molecular ions, of molecular formula H(n)(-) (3 ≤ n-odd ≤ 13). Our previous publications [Sapse, A. M.; et al. Nature 1979, 278, 332; Rayez, J. C.; et al., J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 75, 5393] indicated these molecules would have a shallow minimum and adopt symmetrical geometries that accord with the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) rules for geometries defined by electron pairs surrounding a central point of attraction. These earlier calculations were all based upon Hartree-Fock (HF) calculations with a fairly small basis of atomic functions, except for the H3(-) ion for which configuration interaction (CI) calculations were carried out. A related paper [Hirao, K.; et al., Chem. Phys. 1983, 80, 237] carried out similar calculations on the same clusters, finding geometries similar to our earlier calculations. However, although that paper argued that the stabilization energy of negative ion clusters H(n)(-) is small, vibration frequencies for the whole set of clusters was not reported, and so a definitive assertion of a true equilibrium was not present. In this paper we recalculate the energetics of the ion induced dipole clusters using density function theory (DFT) B3LYP method calculations in a basis of functions (6-311++G(d,p)). By calculating the vibration frequencies of the VSEPR geometries, we prove that in general they are not true minima because not all the resulting frequencies correspond to real values. By searching the energy surface of the B3LYP calculations, we find the true minimum geometries, which are surprising configurations and are perhaps counterintuitive. We calculate the total energy and binding energy of the new geometries. We also calculate the bond paths associated with the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM). The B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) results, for each molecule, deliver bond paths that radiate between each polarized H2 molecule and the polarizing H(-) ion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207