S03.3 Addressing gender-based violence to reduce risk of STI and HIV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Gender-based violence, and gender inequality more broadly, has been found to be associated with increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STI) including HIV among women and girls as well as among key vulnerable groups such as sex workers. This paper presents the evidence of the increased risk of STI and HIV associated with gender-based violence; and looks at potential pathways by which gender-based violence and STI and HIV are linked. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that measure the association between intimate partner violence and STI and HIV was conducted by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and WHO as part of work feeding into the Global Burden of Disease Study estimates on violence against women and its health impacts. Another systematic review of studies that measure association between violence against sex workers and STI and HIV was also conducted by the University of British Columbia, Vancouver and WHO. Other studies and literature were reviewed to identify potential pathways to explain the links between gender-based violence and HIV. Results The results of the systematic review show that best estimate of association between physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence and HIV was an odds ratio (OR) of 1.52 (95% CI = 1.03 to 2.23) for HIV, from studies from generalized and concentrated HIV epidemics and slightly higher for syphilis, chlamydia or gonorrhea. . These studies, however, are mainly cross sectional population-based surveys among women in the general population. The systematic review of violence against sex workers shows that sex workers from India and US who experience sexual violence have between 2 and 3-fold increased risk of HIV sero-positivity. Sex workers who experience any form of physical or sexual violence by any perpetrator in studies from India (Karnataka), Thailand, USA (San Francico) also showed increased risk of STI sero-positivity. Studies suggest 4 potential pathways linking gender-based violence and STI/HIV. First, sexual violence can be directly associated with increased STI and HIV transmission. There are also several indirect mechanisms; these include a history of violence in childhood or adolescence being linked to increased sexual risk taking later; and difficulties in negotiation of condom use with the partner. Also, men who perpetrate violence are also more likely to engage in sexual risk taking. Third, fear of violence can prevent women and sex workers from seeking or accessing HIV information and services. Lastly, violence can be an outcome of diagnosis and disclosure of HIV status. Conclusion Interventions to address the HIV epidemic among women and among sex workers need to address violence as a risk factor. In each setting, interventions need to be based on an understanding of the potential pathways that link violence against women and sex workers to STI and HIV infection. HIV prevention, treatment, and care programmes for women and for sex workers can integrate violence prevention into their risk-reduction counselling and communication, work with men and boys to promote gender equality and reduce violence perpetration, empower women, girls and sex workers, address harmful gender norms that perpetuate the acceptability of violence, and address the harmful use of alcohol. Laws and policies that criminalize sex workers and that perpetuate gender-based discrimination against women and girls also need to be addressed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".