Genome-based Definition of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease-associated Adherent-Invasive Escherichia coli Pathovar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mucosal-associated Escherichia coli are commonly found in inflamed tissues during inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These bacteria often possess an adherent and invasive phenotype but lack virulence-associated features of well-described intestinal E. coli pathogens, and are of diverse serology and phylotypes, making it difficult to correlate strain characteristics with exacerbations of disease. METHODS: The genome sequences of 14 phenotypically assigned adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) isolates obtained from intestinal biopsies of patients with IBD were compared with the genome sequences of 37 other pathogenic and commensal E. coli available from public databases. RESULTS: Core genome-based phylogenetic analyses and genome-wide comparison of genetic content established the existence of a closely related cluster of AIEC strains with 3 distinct genetic insertions differentiating them from commensal E. coli. These strains are of the B2 phylotype have a variant type VI secretion system (T6SS-1), and are highly related to extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli, suggesting that these 2 clinically distinct pathovars have common virulence strategies. Four other mucosally adherent E. coli strains from patients with IBD were of diverse phylogenetic origins and lacked the 3 genetic features, suggesting that they are not related to the B2 AIEC cluster. Although AIEC are often considered as having a unique association with Crohn's disease, isolates from Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis were genetically indistinguishable. CONCLUSIONS: B2 AIEC thus represent a closely related cluster of IBD-associated E. coli strains that are distinct from normal commensal isolates, and which should be considered separately from the phenotypically similar but genetically distinct non-B2 AIEC strains when considering their association with intestinal pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".